WHAT INFRASTRUCTURE !
The production dream of clean, green, hydrogen may be coming of age, but providing the infrastructure to make the transition to zero emission mobility remains elusive. So don't go congratulating yourselves just yet FCH!
A battle royal is raging in board rooms in just about every OEM aiming to produce cars, vans and trucks that are zero emissions, where there is no clear cut infrastructure to support policies aimed at such transition. But the infrastructure is not their problem. Or is it?
Surely the vehicle OEMs have enough on their plate adapting their vehicle ranges on the assumption of Plug & Charge and high-pressure hydrogen pumps. Well yes, they have plenty to be getting on with, but what should they be getting on with in the best interests of their investors - if there is no secure energy infrastructure?
Indeed, that is the burning (if you'll pardon the pun) question.
The plain fact is that they are just as confused as the (would be) buying public. Should they go for hydrogen or lithium?
That's a whole lot of 'ifs' and 'maybes' for companies with so much at stake if they get it wrong. And it's not as if they were caught by surprise.
They've had years to prepare, and knew all about global warming, so must have realised the implications of failing to act in good time. They must have realised that with the likes of Greta Thunberg and Extinction Rebellion taking the stage, that all their trade association spin-doctoring as to the virtues of the Internal Combustion Engine, would eventually fail in the wake of real science and melting ice caps that all schoolchildren and university students know about; the voters & investors of tomorrow.
You'd imagine that utilities would be rubbing their hands together at the prospect of a massive increase in electricity sales, tinged with problems of supply for all those charging points, and potential meltdown of the system, enter the V2G charging system that actually increases Range Anxiety for drivers of EVs. V2G is evidence of the lack of viable alternative solutions and the very real worry as to infrastructure insecurities, that can be overcome.
The same problem is being wrestled in Parliaments, by politicians and civil servants, who are doing all they can to cajole industry into providing their country with policy solutions, knowing deep down they are fighting a losing battle - but braving it out in the absence of any real plan - just hoping for a miracle.
We genuinely feel for them all. But it is all about planning well in advance, rather than retrospective knee-jerks and praying on bended knees. For example, load levelling service stations and cartridge exchange systems have been just sitting on the shelf for almost 10 years now with no takers. Why? Because there was no political will for change. Nobody likes change. We like the comfort of what we know, and will resist change to the bitter end.
Where comfort is the enemy of progress, policy changes are only just making board room executives uncomfortable enough to do something, and even then it is mostly to do with shareholders grumbling about bleeding profits as their Chair persons and Chief Executive Officers have been advocating paying competitors to compensate for the lack of performance of their own company.
That is tantamount to investing in your competitors, but without any returns, indeed, watching the devaluation of your own shares and paying for the privilege. Does that make you wonder who your CEOs are working for?
Time to invest elsewhere? You betcha! A portfolio review is always a good thing.
Enter the SMARTer infrastructure solution. Basically, a Service Station designed for cities and motorways that not only provides a load levelling well for green energy, but can also provide range extending Cartridges for heavy haulage vehicles and large vans that are so equipped. With the range solution for HGVs being the most valuable asset, now that electric trucks are finally to be available in increasing numbers. The beauty of the system being that most existing trucks can be custom, retro-fitted, without altering the chassis of the vehicle. Subject of course to a survey and feasibility study. And, we are not talking about hydrogen or lithium energy cartridges, we are talking about both. With hydrogen potentially the winner in the longer term, interchangeably.
Such a system should be included in EC Contract No. 296 (See below).
Any OEM, Utility or Government interested in investing in this technology, should contact us for details as to how to future proof their interests, or at least hedge their bets. Because in a confused world it pays not to have all your eggs in one basket.
What we are offering is a way to stop leaching money buying carbon credits from your competitors, when you could be investing the same sums in the infrastructure of tomorrow - and at least have something to show your shareholders (or your grandchildren), that is positive.
More than that, as investors, you will play an important part in steering development to suit the vehicles you want to build, or in the case of utilities, meet your obligations under the Climate Change, Energy and Automated & Electric Vehicle Acts.
GREEN NEWS APRIL 2021 - Fiat Chrysler Automobiles revealed that they spent over 300 million euros ($362 million) on green credits last year in Europe, most of which went to Tesla. The FCA part of the group bought more than $362 million worth of CO2 credits last year in Europe alone. Indeed, the company committed to spending about $2 billion in credits between 2019 and 2021. Money that could have been invested better in their future and products.
APRIL 2021 WHAT IS THE IDEAL RATIO - HYDROGEN Vs LITHIUM?
The FCH-JU have just advertised a call for tenders in an amount of €200,000 EUR, for a study, looking to define:
"The subject of this call for tenders is to provide evidence, through a comprehensive study, of the possible optimal blend between electric recharging and hydrogen refueling infrastructure covering the full spectrum of road transport applications.
The study should allow to assess, both per Member State and at European level, the best way to deploy these infrastructures, the synergies and interactions with other existing ones.
The results may be used to provide the input necessary for stakeholders on which possible deployment strategies for electric charging and hydrogen refueling for all the various transport modes."
Tender reference number FCH / OP / CONTRACT NO. 296
Title Study on Impact of Deployment of
Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV) and Fuel Cells Electric Vehicles
Electrolyzer capacity to produce green hydrogen looks set to spark a green energy revolution, provided the infrastructure is in place to support the move.
LINKS & REFERENCE
Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site
This website is provided on a free basis as a public information service. copyright © Climate Change Trust 2021. Solar Studios, BN271RF, United Kingdom.